From what I’ve heard, there are three general categories of theories regarding the purpose of the numbers being entered into the computer every 108 minutes.
- The numbers being entered are necessary to trigger the system to perform some task that is needed as a part of the experiment. What that “something” is varies widely from theory to theory (aligning with satellites, etc.)
- The numbers are a “dead man’s switch”, meaning that they don’t do anything other than prevent something bad from happening if they are NOT pressed. For example, the that if something went wrong, or the island got into the wrong hands, etc. and the numbers did not get pressed the island would self destruct, etc.
- The number punching has no technical purpose whatsoever, and exists only as a sociological / psychological part of the experiment.
Personally, I have always leaned towards ruling out #1, even though it is a component of some pretty popular theories out there. To have such an elaborate technological set up (with all the other gear they appear to have, and the assumed advanced control of electro-magnetic systems, etc.) the idea that they would be running a software control system so primitive as to not support the most basic of scheduled tasks is a bit of a stretch. Even on the Apple II (or whatever that ancient workstation is), you could write a simple program that would prevent you having to type in the same exact numbers at a fixed interval of time.
This would leave numbers two or three, and I’m currently not sure which one to go with. On the one hand, it wouldn’t seem to be much of an effective “dead man’s switch” if the numbers were so easy to come by (printed on the outside of the hatch, Desmond telling talking freely about them). Side note: I am really interested to find out more about Desmond; specifically where he’s been since we last saw him.
It kind of makes me tend to believe the third one, although what happens then if they do allow them to go all the way down? If it’s nothing, then they obviously would stop pushing them, and then what?
I wholeheartedly disagree with 









Recent Comments